Skip to main content

Bridging the Gap Between Latent and Explicit Reasoning with Looped Transformers

Ying Fan, Anej Svete, Kangwook Lee

LOTUS repeatedly refines blocks of continuous reasoning states in parallel, training each position to predict a token from a worked solution. It generates answers from those states and studies accuracy, latency and how much of the reasoning can be read back.

First public: · Added to this list: October 23, 2026

Cite this paper

ArXiv preprint

arXiv:2606.31779 · Initial submission: 2026-06-30

BibTeX · CSL-JSON

Explore this approach

Internalized reasoning — Learn from worked solutions so that some or all of the reasoning can later happen without writing those steps. Training may use a separate teacher model or progressively remove written steps from the model being trained.

Continuous-state reasoning — Use vectors—lists of numbers—to carry intermediate reasoning from one step to the next, instead of selecting a text token at every step. Some methods use the model's hidden states; others combine several candidate token representations.

Recurrent reasoning — Repeat parts of the model or keep intermediate information in memory while working through a problem. Some methods also learn how many passes to run.

Alternative generation methods — Change how intermediate steps are generated, revised, or searched—for example, by refining several steps in parallel. Some produce written chains of thought.