Monitoring latent reasoning in looped language models
Inspects eight looped language models for state convergence, token decisions, readout quality, attention behavior, and sensitivity to injected noise. Finds important differences between models that receive the prompt once and those that reintroduce it at each loop.
First public: · Added to this list: October 18, 2026
Cite this paper
ArXiv preprint
arXiv:2610.18127 · Initial submission: 2026-10-13
A published-version citation has not been verified for this entry. This does not mean the paper is unpublished.
Choose the version you used. The arXiv link may serve a revision; check the original paper for the exact result, assumptions and limitations you cite.
Explore this approach
Analysis and evaluation — Measure how well these methods work, investigate what their internal computation does, and identify where they fail. This includes experiments, studies of model internals, and mathematical results.
Recurrent reasoning — Repeat parts of the model or keep intermediate information in memory while working through a problem. Some methods also learn how many passes to run.
Read or reuse this entry
Plain-text Markdown · JSON record · Find in the full list
Our summary and categories are a reading aid, not the authors’ abstract. Use the original paper for research claims. Suggest a correction.