Skip to main content

Analysis and evaluation

Measure how well these methods work, investigate what their internal computation does, and identify where they fail. This includes experiments, studies of model internals, and mathematical results.

For example: A researcher replaces an intermediate state with one taken from a different problem, then checks how the answer changes. This tests what information that state contributes to the solution.

Download these papers: Markdown · JSON

How the methods connect and differ

Recovering information and testing its use

Recovering an intermediate answer from hidden states is different from showing that the model uses it. The multi-hop study by Yang and colleagues separates recall of a bridge entity from its contribution to the final answer, including interventions on internal representations. Evidence was stronger for the first hop than for the complete two-hop computation and varied by relation type. That distinction matters when interpreting claims that a model reasons internally.

Sources: Yang et al. (2024)

Paper details: Do Large Language Models Latently Perform Multi-Hop Reasoning?

75 papers, oldest first

Dates usually refer to the first arXiv submission. Search or filter these papers →

arXiv

Do Language Models Use Their Depth Efficiently?

Róbert Csordás, Christopher D. Manning, Christopher Potts

Skips layers and compares shallow and deep models to examine what extra layers compute. In the models studied, later layers mostly make smaller refinements rather than adding new reasoning steps.

Analysis and evaluationRecurrent reasoning
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2505.13898
arXiv survey

A Survey on Latent Reasoning

Rui-Jie Zhu, Tianhao Peng, Tianhao Cheng, Xingwei Qu, Jinfa Huang, Dawei Zhu, Hao Wang, Kaiwen Xue, Xuanliang Zhang, Yong Shan, Tianle Cai, Taylor Kergan, Assel Kembay, Andrew Smith, Chenghua Lin, Binh Nguyen, Yuqi Pan, Yuhong Chou, Zefan Cai, Zhenhe Wu, Yongchi Zhao, Tianyu Liu, Jian Yang, Wangchunshu Zhou, Chujie Zheng, Chongxuan Li, Yuyin Zhou, Zhoujun Li, Zhaoxiang Zhang, Jiaheng Liu, Ge Zhang, Wenhao Huang, Jason Eshraghian

Surveys latent-reasoning methods, evaluation, and applications and accompanies a maintained research bibliography.

Analysis and evaluation
arXiv

LLMs are Single-threaded Reasoners: Demystifying the Working Mechanism of Soft Thinking

Junhong Wu, Jinliang Lu, Zixuan Ren, Gangqiang Hu, Zhi Wu, Dai Dai, Hua Wu

Probes soft-token reasoning and finds that tested models often follow the highest-probability component rather than exploring several paths at once. Introduces stochastic soft thinking, including Gumbel-Softmax sampling, to reduce this greedy behavior.

Analysis and evaluationContinuous-state reasoning
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2508.03440
arXiv

Do Latent Tokens Think? A Causal and Adversarial Analysis of Chain-of-Continuous-Thought

Yuyi Zhang, Boyu Tang, Tianjie Ju, Sufeng Duan, Gongshen Liu

Tests COCONUT with latent-state interventions and deliberately biased examples on MMLU and HotpotQA. Finds weak sensitivity to steering and dependence on dataset shortcuts in the evaluated models, challenging whether their intermediate states faithfully carry the reasoning.

Analysis and evaluationContinuous-state reasoning
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2512.21711
arXiv

Chain Of Thought Compression: A Theoretical Analysis

Juncai Li, Ru Li, Yuxiang Zhou, Boxiang Ma, Jeff Z. Pan

Analyzes how skipping intermediate steps weakens learning signals in a simplified parity-task model. Introduces NatBool-DAG to test logical dependencies and ALiCoT, which supervises learned token states with intermediate logical labels or explicit-CoT representations.

Analysis and evaluationInternalized reasoningThinking tokens
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2601.21576
ACL 2026

Unlocking the Black Box of Latent Reasoning: An Interpretability-Guided Approach to Intervention

Shuochen Chang, Tong Bai, Xiaofeng Zhang, Qianli Ma, Qingyang Liu, Zhaohe Liao, Yibo Miao, Li Niu

Uses probes, ablations, and targeted edits to study how continuous reasoning states affect answers. Builds interventions from learned semantic mappings and geometric constraints, improving the evaluated models by editing their latent states without updating base-model weights.

Analysis and evaluationContinuous-state reasoning
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2606.01243
arXiv

Observable Patterns Are Not Explanations: A Causal-Geometric Analysis of Latent Reasoning Models

Darpan Aswal, Thomas Palmeira Ferraz, Yongxin Zhou, Maxime Peyrard

Compares Coconut and CODI with controls lacking their proposed reasoning recurrence or curriculum. Finds that decodable patterns can also appear in controls, while interventions reveal varying causal use of latent states concentrated in low-dimensional directions.

Analysis and evaluationContinuous-state reasoning
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2606.12689
arXiv

Detecting Hidden Chain-of-Thought in Large Language Models with Linguistic, Behavioral, and Mechanistic Indicators

Armaan Singh, Ryan Trinh Le, Jasmine Kaur, Abdullah Sultan, Edward Lue Chee Lip, Kiran Nijjer, Adnan Ahmed, Vasu Sharma

Compares behavior under neutral, explicit-CoT, and no-CoT prompts using linguistic and internal-state measurements. Its score measures resemblance to CoT behavior, not direct evidence of a hidden reasoning trace; calibration controls expose important confounds.

Analysis and evaluation
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2608.29956
arXiv

Dissecting Hierarchical Reasoning Models: A Mechanistic Study

Leo Raphael Rodrigues, Jian Kang

Uses state interventions, probes, and feature ablations to study how hierarchical recurrent models solve Sudoku, mazes, and ARC tasks. Compares hierarchical and single-state recurrence, and distinguishes information that can be read from a state from information that causally affects an answer.

Analysis and evaluationRecurrent reasoning
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2609.22197
arXiv

SMELT: Scaling Laws for Compute-Matched MoE Looped Transformers

Shaowen Wang, Ge Zhang, Kairong Luo, Yuhao Wu, Shaofan Liu, Jiaheng Liu, Wenhao Huang, Shen Yan, Jian Li

Loops the middle half of a mixture-of-experts transformer twice while matching an unlooped baseline on computation, parameter count, and KV-cache size. Studies how the comparison changes with model scale and examines the attention patterns produced by revisiting layers.

Recurrent reasoningAnalysis and evaluation
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2609.01343
arXiv

Fractal basins trap latent reasoning

Jeffrey Lai, Anthony Bao, John Quinn, William Gilpin

Studies recurrent reasoning trajectories as dynamical systems on puzzles and mathematical logic. Links long solution times in the tested models to transient trapping near unstable states associated with nearly correct solutions.

Analysis and evaluationRecurrent reasoning
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2609.04963
arXiv

LOCKR: A Hidden-State Trajectory-Guided Planner for Detecting and Repairing Stable-but-Wrong Lock-In in Diffusion Language Models

Guoshenghui Zhao, Tan Yu, Weijie Zhao

Uses the history of diffusion hidden states to detect answers that become stable but remain wrong. A planner selects targeted repair branches and verifies continuations, testing whether these internal trajectories support better repair decisions than confidence or a single snapshot.

Analysis and evaluationAlternative generation methods
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2609.27220
arXiv

Ceiling of a Task: When Can a Transformer Succeed Without Its Chain of Thought?

Jiashu He, Jinxuan Fan, Xiao Xiao, Radu Marculescu, Alejandro Ribeiro

Analyzes tasks for which a fixed-depth transformer needs an informative chain of thought to exceed a task-specific accuracy limit. Combines circuit-based results with experiments that replace, erase, or shuffle reasoning tokens, including comparisons with filler tokens.

Analysis and evaluationThinking tokens
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2609.33134
arXiv

Why Deterministic PRM Guidance Underperforms in Discrete Diffusion Reasoning

Yan Zhan, Shaobo Liu, Zhijun Gao

Compares process-reward guidance with independent sampling and final-answer reranking at matched forward-pass budgets. In the tested diffusion models, early pruning removes promising candidates and intermediate-state scorers can be poor final judges; the generated solutions remain textual.

Analysis and evaluationAlternative generation methods
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2609.35472
arXiv

Reliable Parallel Decoding in Masked Diffusion Language Models

Zhenghao He, Bohan Liu, Guangzhi Xiong, Aidong Zhang

Studies when simultaneously committing several predicted tokens breaks their reasoning dependencies. RPD combines stability across final layers with confidence and uncertainty in preceding positions to defer unsupported predictions while retaining parallel text generation.

Analysis and evaluationAlternative generation methods
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2609.36452
arXiv

Scheduling Recursive Reasoning in Looped Transformers

Boyuan Wang, Chengyao Yu, Jiaxi Ren, Hongxin Wei, Bingyi Jing, Yuxin Tao

Adjusts the size of each hidden-state update based on whether recent updates make consistent progress or fluctuate. Tests the resulting scheduler with and without additional training.

Recurrent reasoningAnalysis and evaluation
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2609.36653
arXiv

Looped Transformers as Optimizers

Yulong Huang, Chen Jiang, Zhanpeng Zhou, Hongtao Zhang, Tianyu Li, Tianyu He, Xiangyu Zhang, Bojun Cheng

Treats each recurrent hidden-state update as an optimization step and derives loop designs from this view. Introduces OperLoop, combining adaptive step sizes and weight decay.

Recurrent reasoningAnalysis and evaluation
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2609.37379
arXiv

What Limits Recursive Reasoning Models: Optimization, Architecture and Test-Time Scaling

Yuliana Shakhvalieva, Dmitrii Kharchev, Viacheslav Bezrukov, Inessa Fedorova, Dmitry Bocharov, Ivan Oseledets, Valerii Ternovskii

Compares recursive reasoning models under a common training and evaluation setup. Isolates the effects of gradient propagation, batch size, state updates, and hierarchical structure on algorithmic tasks and generalization.

Recurrent reasoningAnalysis and evaluation
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2609.39967
arXiv

Scaling Laws for Looped Mixture of Experts

Yanbei Chen, Anirudh Goyal, Raghuraman Krishnamoorthi

Fits scaling laws that jointly account for recurrent depth, expert sparsity, model size, and training data in looped mixture-of-experts models. Uses them to study how to allocate resources under compute and memory constraints.

Recurrent reasoningAnalysis and evaluation
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2609.40316
arXiv

Temporally-Resolved Token Attribution Reveals the Generation Dynamics of Diffusion Language Models

Darpan Aswal, Céline Hudelot

Extends integrated-gradient attribution across layers and denoising steps to examine which inputs influence a diffusion model's developing response. Includes multi-hop graph reasoning; the authors present attribution as a complement to, not a replacement for, causal intervention.

Analysis and evaluationAlternative generation methods
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2610.01177
arXiv

On the Chain-of-Thought Monitorability of Looped Language Models

Han Wang, Ishwar B Balappanawar, Huan Zhang

Tests how recurrent depth affects the ability to monitor a language model through its written chain of thought. Finds task-dependent changes under stress tests, while matched comparisons do not show a general monitorability disadvantage for looped architectures.

Analysis and evaluationRecurrent reasoning
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2610.02741
arXiv

Efficient Reasoning with Flow Language Models

Hanru Bai, Faissal Izermine, Oscar Davis, T. Konstantin Rusch

Compares continuous flow and discrete diffusion models at matched sizes and denoising steps. A theoretical account and intermediate-state interventions examine whether retaining information about several candidates helps solve mazes and Sudoku before final discretization.

Analysis and evaluationContinuous-state reasoningAlternative generation methods
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2610.09416
arXiv

S-Space: Exploring Spatial Workspace in Multimodal Language Models

Zhiyuan Shi, Xiang Li, Xingzhuo Guo, Shangchen Miao, Weiliang Chen, Qiyu Dai, Jinshan Ren, Jiangran Lyu, Fangfu Liu, Mingsheng Long, Jialong Wu

Identifies spatial-coordinate directions in multimodal model activations and tests them through causal interventions. Separating perception from viewpoint transformation reveals cases where a model represents object locations but fails to perform the required spatial computation.

Analysis and evaluation
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2610.13527
arXiv

Knowledge transfer between simple discrete worlds

Silvère Gangloff, Jan Hula

Evaluates a depth-recurrent model on Sudoku-like worlds with different rule combinations. Compares symbolic rule descriptions with solved examples when the test world contains new puzzles, new combinations, or unfamiliar rule instances.

Recurrent reasoningAnalysis and evaluation
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2610.15081
arXiv

Running Fewer Loops Removes Refusal Behaviour in Recurrent-Depth Language Models

Seyedarmin Azizi, Erfan Baghaei Potraghloo, Arya Fayyazi, Saeid Shokoufa, Massoud Pedram

Studies how reducing recurrent depth changes refusal behavior in two looped language-model families. Uses probes and interventions to distinguish recognizing a harmful request from refusing it, and tests safety training across randomly selected depths.

Analysis and evaluationRecurrent reasoning
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2610.15218
arXiv

Monitoring latent reasoning in looped language models

Pawel Olszowiec, Paulina Tomaszewska, Maciej Żelaszczyk, Michal Byra, Neo Christopher Chung

Inspects eight looped language models for state convergence, token decisions, readout quality, attention behavior, and sensitivity to injected noise. Finds important differences between models that receive the prompt once and those that reintroduce it at each loop.

Analysis and evaluationRecurrent reasoning
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2610.18127
arXiv

Looped Reasoning Finishes Earlier Than You Think

Sumin Park, T. Konstantin Rusch

Studies how oscillations can slow convergence in recurrent reasoning models. Proposes an architecture whose rotational state changes are separated from the representation used for reasoning, and tests convergence on puzzle-solving tasks.

Recurrent reasoningAnalysis and evaluation
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2610.18174
arXiv

Does Latent Chain-of-Thought Actually Reason? A Single, Unifying Taxonomy for Latent Reasoning

Jingjie Qiu, Sheldon Yu, Xunyi Jiang, Jiajin Liu, Zihan Huang, Zhendong Chu, Tong Yu, Julian McAuley, Junda Wu

Uses chain deletion, content replacement, probes, and trajectory analysis across 21 model-task configurations. Separates what continuous states encode from whether the model uses their content, finding that dependence on the chain varies with task and training recipe.

Analysis and evaluationContinuous-state reasoning
Paper ↗ Details & citations arXiv:2610.21182