Skip to main content

When Internalization Fails: Finding Better Targets for Reasoning Compression

Mourad Heddaya, Manley Roberts, Rohan Wadhawan, Chenhao Tan

Tests segment-removal curricula, a segment-based Coconut adaptation, and shorter teacher targets on competition math. Training on the teacher’s post-think explanation gives a better accuracy–token trade-off than the tested internalization curricula.

First public: · Added to this list: November 9, 2026

Author-hosted preprint upload date. Date source.

Cite this paper

Published version

When Internalization Fails: Finding Better Targets for Reasoning Compression
Mourad Heddaya, Manley Roberts, Rohan Wadhawan, Chenhao Tan
Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2026, 2026, pp. 14935-14946.

DOI: 10.18653/v1/2026.findings-acl.734

BibTeX · CSL-JSON

Explore this approach

Analysis and evaluation — Measure how well these methods work, investigate what their internal computation does, and identify where they fail. This includes experiments, studies of model internals, and mathematical results.

Internalized reasoning — Learn from worked solutions so that some or all of the reasoning can later happen without writing those steps. Training may use a separate teacher model or progressively remove written steps from the model being trained.